|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
Checklist results - final conclusionsTo
pull together the results of all three "key players" in sustainable
development, and Local Agenda 21 work, all those interviewed, are
actively participating, in one way or another. This indicates that
municipalities within the Nordic countries have been quite active in
fulfilling the requirements of Agenda 21, signed in Rio de Janeiro in
1992. There are mainly two aspects where the municipalities could do
better. Emphasis on the social aspects is in general very little and in
some cases, they would need to do better in "getting it into the
system". This applies to actively involving the staff and making LA21 a
defined procedure within all of their operations. Bearing in mind these limitations, it is nevertheless interesting to see that emphasis on the environment is increasing in the Nordic countries. Good Local Agenda 21 work in each community is based on broad participation, from top to bottom. The municipalities lead the way in so many of the basic environmental factors, such as waste and sewage. The companies are another key player, who have a tremendous power. The results indicate that they seem to have an increasing awareness of the environment, which is possibly due to demands from their markets. Finally, an increased environmental awareness and the empowerment of individuals from early age, is what can be seen in the nursery schools. All this can only lead to an optimistic conclusion about a future with better balance between ecological, economical and social aspects. The participants in the "Vi lærer af hindanden" project, did a very good job on gathering the information for the checklists. They generally proved to be very enthusiastic and knowledgeable about environmental issues. After only ten to twenty years, their generation will be stepping into more power in their countries. The message that they took with them from the project was that it is their role to bridge the gap into a sustainable future. The results from the checklists
with the municipalities show that in general young people are not
active participants in LA21 work. When asked whether this is a general
"nobody ever listens to us" syndrome, many of the participants could
agree to that. Other explanations raised were also that they are at a
time in their life when they tend to be very occupied with other
things, such as school, hobbies, work and friends. But the interest is
there, and some shared that they had actively tried to take part in
community matters, but did not get listened to, or given opportunities. This project achieved a good balance between edcuation, activities and giving participants opportunities to get to know each other. Hopefully, the project has also supported LA21 work within the participants´ municipalities, if only through the discussions that took place during the checklist interviews and follow up in the home towns. There is every reason to explore further projects within the field of environment and/or Local Agenda 21, in the Nordic friendship schemes. Especially, involving young people is a very positive way to nourish a fertile ground, both within the Nordic friendship schemes as such and also for a better future on the planet. |
||
|
|||